PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Definition of apical descent in women with and without previous hysterectomy: A retrospective analysis.

  • Gerda Trutnovsky,
  • Kristy P Robledo,
  • Ka Lai Shek,
  • Hans Peter Dietz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213617
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 3
p. e0213617

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundWhile normal pelvic organ support has been defined for women with intact uterus, this is not the case for post- hysterectomy vault descent. A recent systematic review found that definitions of apical prolapse are highly variable.ObjectivesTo investigate the relationship between prolapse symptoms and apical POP-Q measurements and establish cutoffs for 'significant apical descent using receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) statistics.Study designRetrospective analysis of patients seen at a tertiary urogynecological unit. Evaluation included a standardized interview and clinical assessment using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. ROC curves were prepared for the relationship between prolapse symptoms and POP-Q measure "C".ResultsThe records of 3010 women were available for analysis. Prolapse symptoms were reported by 52.3% (n = 1573), with a mean bother of 5.9 (SD 3.0, range 0-10). POP-Q point "C" was associated with symptoms of prolapse (p ConclusionA cut- off for 'significant central compartment descent' of 5 cm above the hymen on Valsalva seems valid regardless of previous hysterectomy.