Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra (Dec 2022)

Predicting atrial fibrillation after ischemic stroke: clinical, genetics and electrocardiogram modelling

  • Mervyn Qi Wei Poh,
  • Carol Huilian Tham,
  • Jeremiah David Ming Siang Chee,
  • Seyed Ehsan Saffari,
  • Kenny Wee Kian Tan,
  • Li Wei Tan,
  • Ebonne Yulin Ng,
  • Celestia Pei Xuan Yeo,
  • Christopher Ying Hao Seet,
  • Joanne Peiting Xie,
  • Jonathan Yexian Lai,
  • Rajinder Singh,
  • Eng-King Tan,
  • Tian Ming Tu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000528516

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging in patients after ischemic stroke due to its paroxysmal nature. We aim to determine the utility of a combined clinical, electrocardiographic and genetic variables model to predict AF in a post-stroke population. Materials and Methods: We performed a cohort study at a single comprehensive stroke centre from 09/11/2009 to 31/10/2017. All patients recruited were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks. Electrocardiographic variables including p-wave terminal force (PWTF), corrected QT interval (QTc) and genetic variables including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) at the 4q25 (rs2200733) were evaluated. Clinical, electrocardiographic and genetic variables of patients without AF and those who developed AF were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics were performed to identify parameters and determine their ability to predict the occurrence of AF. Results: Out of 709 patients (median age of 59 years, IQR 52-67) recruited, sixty (8.5%) were found to develop AF on follow-up. Age (odds ratio (OR): 3.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.03-5.98, p<0.0001), hypertension (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.36-5.63, p=0.0052) and valvular heart disease (OR: 8.49, 95% CI: 2.62-27.6, p<0.004 were the strongest predictors of AF, with area under receiver operating value of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.82), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87) when electrocardiographic variables (PWTF and QTc) were added. SNP did not improve prediction modelling. Conclusion: We demonstrated that a model combining clinical and electrocardiographic variables provided robust prediction of AF in our post-stroke population. Role of SNP in prediction of AF was limited.