Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Jan 2024)

Remote myocardial fibrosis predicts adverse outcome in patients with myocardial infarction on clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

  • Nicholas Black,
  • Joshua Bradley,
  • Erik B. Schelbert,
  • Laura J. Bonnett,
  • Gavin A. Lewis,
  • Jakub Lagan,
  • Christopher Orsborne,
  • Pamela F. Brown,
  • Fardad Soltani,
  • Fredrika Fröjdh,
  • Martin Ugander,
  • Timothy C. Wong,
  • Miho Fukui,
  • Joao L. Cavalcante,
  • Josephine H. Naish,
  • Simon G. Williams,
  • Theresa McDonagh,
  • Matthias Schmitt,
  • Christopher A. Miller

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. 2
p. 101064

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT: Background: Heart failure (HF) most commonly occurs in patients who have had a myocardial infarction (MI), but factors other than MI size may be deterministic. Fibrosis of myocardium remote from the MI is associated with adverse remodeling. We aimed to 1) investigate the association between remote myocardial fibrosis, measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) extracellular volume fraction (ECV), and HF and death following MI, 2) identify predictors of remote myocardial fibrosis in patients with evidence of MI and determine the relationship with infarct size. Methods: Multicenter prospective cohort study of 1199 consecutive patients undergoing CMR with evidence of MI on late gadolinium enhancement. Median follow-up was 1133 (895–1442) days. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify factors predictive of the primary outcome, a composite of first hospitalization for HF (HHF) or all-cause mortality, post-CMR. Linear regression modeling was used to identify determinants of remote ECV. Results: Remote myocardial fibrosis was a strong predictor of primary outcome (χ2: 15.6, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07 per 1% increase in ECV, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.11, p < 0.001) and was separately predictive of both HHF and death. The strongest predictors of remote ECV were diabetes, sex, natriuretic peptides, and body mass index, but, despite extensive phenotyping, the adjusted model R2 was only 0.283. The relationship between infarct size and remote fibrosis was very weak. Conclusion: Myocardial fibrosis, measured using CMR ECV, is a strong predictor of HHF and death in patients with evidence of MI. The mechanisms underlying remote myocardial fibrosis formation post-MI remain poorly understood, but factors other than infarct size appear to be important.

Keywords