Systematic Reviews (Jul 2020)

Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement

  • David Gough,
  • Phil Davies,
  • Gro Jamtvedt,
  • Etienne Langlois,
  • Julia Littell,
  • Tamara Lotfi,
  • Edoardo Masset,
  • Tracy Merlin,
  • Andrew S. Pullin,
  • Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga,
  • John-Arne Røttingen,
  • Emily Sena,
  • Ruth Stewart,
  • David Tovey,
  • Howard White,
  • Jennifer Yost,
  • Hans Lund,
  • Jeremy Grimshaw

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01415-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This paper is the initial Position Statement of Evidence Synthesis International, a new partnership of organizations that produce, support and use evidence synthesis around the world. The paper (i) argues for the importance of synthesis as a research exercise to clarify what is known from research evidence to inform policy, practice and personal decision making; (ii) discusses core issues for research synthesis such as the role of research evidence in decision making, the role of perspectives, participation and democracy in research and synthesis as a core component of evidence ecosystems; (iii) argues for 9 core principles for ESI on the nature and role of research synthesis; and (iv) lists the 5 main goals of ESI as a coordinating partnership for promoting and enabling the production and use of research synthesis.