Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial ()

Comparative study of five commercial probes for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) by in situ hybridization in cases of nodular sclerosis Hodgki's lymphoma

  • Suely Nonogaki,
  • Neuza K. Shirata,
  • Lidia M. Kimura,
  • Juliana M. Guerra,
  • Raphael S. S. Medeiros,
  • Roberto Antonio P. Paes,
  • Cristina T. Kanamura,
  • Camila C. Oliveira,
  • Yara de Menezes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20160065
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 52, no. 6
pp. 416 – 425

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT Introduction: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may serve as a target in therapeutic treatments, thus reliable diagnostic results are necessary. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of EBV detection by in situ hybridization (ISH) using five commercial probes in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of nodular sclerosis Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), and to compare the results with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Material and method: Thirty samples were selected, 28 were lymph nodes, one bone marrow and one mediastinum. The following parameters were analyzed: signal intensity; proportionality of positive cells; quality of the reaction according to comfort for evaluation, sign quality and homogeneity of labeled cells; background reaction; morphology; presence of artifacts; and positivity in other non-neoplastic cells. All samples were analyzed for EBV detection using the five probes, IHC for latent membrane protein type 1 (LMP1) and PCR for Epstein Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1). Statistical analyses were performed with the R1 software; Fleiss' test and Cohen Kappa index of 5% were considered significant. Results: The detection by IHC-LMP1 was 26.7% (8/30) and 66.7% (20/30) by PCR-EBNA1. All probes detected EBV. Positivity was observed in 42/90 (46.7%), 38/90 (42.2%), 45/90 (50%), 27/90 (30%) and 61/90 (67.8%) for probes A, B, C, D and E, respectively. Discussion: All five probes demonstrated positivity. Conclusion: Probe E showed better rate (67.8%), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (100%), a very good correlation among the different observers and with PCR, besides great cost-benefits relation.

Keywords