Physiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain
Elena Ivanova
Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Raquel Romar
Physiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain
Soledad García-Martínez
Physiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain
Cristina Soriano-Úbeda
Physiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain
Francisco A García-Vázquez
Physiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain
Heba Saadeh
Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Bioinformatics Group, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Simon Andrews
Bioinformatics Group, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Physiology of Reproduction Group, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia-Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain; Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain
The number of children born since the origin of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) exceeds 5 million. The majority seem healthy, but a higher frequency of defects has been reported among ART-conceived infants, suggesting an epigenetic cost. We report the first whole-genome DNA methylation datasets from single pig blastocysts showing differences between in vivo and in vitro produced embryos. Blastocysts were produced in vitro either without (C-IVF) or in the presence of natural reproductive fluids (Natur-IVF). Natur-IVF embryos were of higher quality than C-IVF in terms of cell number and hatching ability. RNA-Seq and DNA methylation analyses showed that Natur-IVF embryos have expression and methylation patterns closer to in vivo blastocysts. Genes involved in reprogramming, imprinting and development were affected by culture, with fewer aberrations in Natur-IVF embryos. Methylation analysis detected methylated changes in C-IVF, but not in Natur-IVF, at genes whose methylation could be critical, such as IGF2R and NNAT.