Trees, Forests and People (Mar 2024)
Assessing the cropland changes into agroforestry and its livelihood outcomes: Evidence from northern Bangladesh
Abstract
This research was conducted to assess the scope and impact of the conversion of croplands into agroforestry orchards considering characterizing agroforestry growers, identify challenges they face during the transition process, and gather their recommended strategies to address these challenges.The investigation took place in Sadar and Biral upazila within Dinajpur district of northern part of Bangladesh. To establish a sample group, an updated roster of total 266 agroforestry growers was procured from the respective Upazila Agriculture Offices. Using a simple random sampling method, 80 growers were selected for participation in this study. Data was gathered through structured and pretested interview schedules administered to respondents between April 15th and May 15th, 2022. The study evaluated ten key attributes of agroforestry growers, encompassing factors like age, educational background, farm size, farming experience, family income, extension network engagement, agricultural knowledge, innovation inclination, marketing orientation, and technological attitude. The central focus of the study centered on the transition from croplands to agroforestry orchards. The study revealed that over the period spanning 1990 to 2022, agroforestry farmers in the study region converted cropland into orchards with varying extents, ranging from 13 % to 19.83 %. The substitution of predominant crops such as rice, maize, and wheat, along with minor crops like potatoes, vegetables, mustard, garlic, turmeric, and napier grass, marked the transition to agroforestry practices. Evaluating the consequences of this transition, approximately 60.00 % of growers perceived medium-level impacts on economic aspects, while 70.00 %, 61.25 %, and 58.75 % alleged the effects on environmental conditions, household food security, and social status, respectively as also moderately. Among the challenges faced during this shift, the most prominent was the difficulty in obtaining fair prices due to intermediary involvement. Conversely, elevated production costs were regarded as a lesser concern. Respondents put forth a variety of solutions, with the primary recommendation being the organization of enhanced training programs for farmers on scientific agroforestry systems management. In contrast, the concept of fostering appropriate coordination among agroforestry practitioners garnered less attention as a potential solution. Therefore, for farmer's enhanced benefit as well as for better environmental outputs and food security, agroforestry product marketing strategy should be strengthening using site specific policy and program.
