Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Sep 2007)
Confiabilidade da medida da dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial pela ultra-sonografia Reliability of brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation measurement using ultrasound
Abstract
OBJETIVO: Determinar a confiabilidade das medidas dos diâmetros basal (DBAB) e pós-oclusão (DPOAB) da artéria braquial e da dilatação fluxo-mediada da artéria braquial (DILA), assim como quantificar o erro típico dessas medidas (ETM). MÉTODOS: A consistência interna (2 medidas intradias) foi determinada em 10 voluntários, enquanto a estabilidade (2 medidas interdias) foi determinada em 13 voluntários aparentemente saudáveis e não-fumantes. As imagens da artéria braquial foram obtidas pelo aparelho de ultra-sonografia bidimensional com Doppler, utilizando transdutor de 14 MHz. As distâncias entre as interfaces íntima-luz foram medidas antes e após interrupção do fluxo sangüíneo durante 5 minutos por manguito posicionado no braço. O DILA foi considerado o porcentual de aumento do DPOAB em relação ao DBAB. RESULTADOS: A ANOVA não identificou diferenças significativas entre as medidas intradias e interdias. Para o DILA, os coeficientes de correlação intraclasse entre as medidas intradias e interdias foram R = 0,7001 e R = 0,8420, respectivamente (p OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of the baseline (BBAB) and post occlusion (POBAD) brachial artery diameters, brachial artery flow-mediated dilatations (BAFMD) measurements, and to quantify the typical error of the measurements (TEM). METHODS: Internal consistency (2 measurements on the same day) was determined in 10 volunteers, whereas stability (2 measurements on separate days) was determined in 13 volunteers. All the volunteers looked healthy and were nonsmokers. The brachial artery images were obtained using a two dimensional Doppler ultrasound instrument: a 14 MHz transducer was used. The distances between the intima-lumen interfaces were measured before and after the blood flow had been stopped by means of a cuff on the arm for five minutes. BAFMD was considered as the percentile increase of POBAD in relation to BBAD. RESULTS: ANOVA did not identify any significant differences between the measurements taken on the same and separate days. For BAFMD, the intraclass correlation coefficients between the measurements taken on the same and separate days were: R = 0.7001 and R = 0.8420, respectively (p < 0.05). The variation coefficients were 5.8% and 12.4% and the relative SMEs were 13.8% and 14.9%, respectively, for the measurements taken on the same and separate days. Analysis of the Bland-Altman graphs indicated that the variables did not present heteroscedastic errors. CONCLUSION: The BBAD, POBAD and BAFMD measurements using the manual ultrasound technique were highly reliable for both the same and separate day measurements and therefore can be used to diagnose and monitor endothelial function.
Keywords
