Medical Devices: Evidence and Research (Apr 2024)
Value and Limitations of Urethrotech Catheterisation Device to Manage Difficult Urethral Catheterisation in Male Spinal Cord Injury Patients
Abstract
Vaidyanathan Subramanian, Bakulesh Madhusudan Soni Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport and Formby District General Hospital, Southport, UKCorrespondence: Vaidyanathan Subramanian, Email [email protected]: We used a Urethrotech catheterisation device in 57 male patients with spinal cord injury, in whom urethral catheterisation was unsuccessful or previous catheterisation was difficult.Results: Urethrotech catheter could be inserted in 51 patients. No patient developed urinary tract infection. In one patient, the guidewire could not be introduced into the bladder, and a coude Foley catheter was inserted. In two patients, the guidewire was inserted into the bladder, but a 16 CH catheter could not be advanced over the guidewire. Emergency suprapubic cystostomy was performed in one case; in the other, urethral stricture was dilated; a size 12 CH catheter was inserted. In three patients, the guidewire curled back into the urethra because of severe spasm of the urethral sphincter. Catheterisation with a Tiemann catheter was successful after administration of diazepam and/or stretching of the anal sphincter by another health professional, which caused reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter. Complications of Urethrotech catheterisation included urethral bleeding, haematuria, pain, doubling back of the guidewire due to spasm of the urethral sphincter or from an empty bladder. We adopted variations in technique, eg filling the bladder with saline prior to catheterisation when feasible, insertion of the guidewire by the side of the old catheter, use of Tiemann tip catheters, administration of antibiotics, diazepam to control spasms, nifedipine to control autonomic dysreflexia, analgesics, stretching of the anal sphincter to induce reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter, urgent imaging studies to confirm correct positioning of the catheter, omitting anticoagulants and monitoring patients, who developed bleeding.Conclusion: Use of Urethrotech in spinal injury patients warranted adaptations to the technique, which required expertise, experience, and backup facilities. To ensure patient safety, Urethrotech catheter should be used in a hospital setting, and by medical personnel with experience in the management of spinal cord injury patients.Keywords: urethral catheterisation, male, patient, urinary bladder, urethral sphincter, paraplegia, patient safety
