BMC Oral Health (Sep 2024)
The role of erythropoietin-loaded hydrogel versus adipose derived stem cell secretome in the regeneration of tongue defects
Abstract
Abstract Background Tongue defects have several etiologies and significantly affect the quality of life. This study was conducted to compare the regenerative potential of erythropoietin (EPO)-loaded hydrogel and adipose derived stem cell (ADSC) secretome on tongue dorsum defects focusing on the role of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage phenotype. Methods Rats were subjected to induction of mechanical circular defects on the dorsal surface of the tongue, then divided into three groups; Group I (control): received 0.1 ml phosphate buffered saline, Group II (EPO): received 5000 U/kg EPO-hydrogel, and Group III (ADSC-Secretome): received 0.1 ml ADSC-Secretome. Treatments were injected circumferentially around wound margins after induction. Seven and fourteen days after treatment, specimens were obtained and processed for histological and immunohistochemical staining followed by the relevant histomorphometric and statistical analyses. Results Seven days after treatment, groups II and III presented defects with some epithelial regeneration at the lateral margins, while the center of the defect showed granulation tissue with much inflammatory cells. The base of the defects showed some muscle fibers and new blood vessels, however group III showed more enhanced neovascularization. Fourteen days after therapeutic intervention, group II defects were completely covered with epithelium showing a thin keratin layer with regular rete pegs interdigitating with the underlying connective tissue papillae, but tongue papillae were not restored. Group III expressed much better healing with developing filiform papillae. The connective tissue showed more vascularity and well-arranged muscle bundles. Both treated groups showed a significant decrease in defect depth and significant increase in anti-inflammatory macrophages compared to the control group at both time intervals, however there was no significant difference between the two treated groups. Conclusion Both treatments showed promising and comparable results in the treatment of tongue defects reducing inflammation and restoring tongue histological architecture with significant upregulation of M2 macrophage.
Keywords
