Obesity Pillars (Dec 2024)

Efficacy of in-person versus digital enhanced lifestyle interventions in adults with overweight and obesity

  • Diego Anazco,
  • Maria A. Espinosa,
  • Lizeth Cifuentes,
  • Blake Kassmeyer,
  • Tara M. Schmidt,
  • Sima Fansa,
  • Alejandro Campos,
  • Elif Tama,
  • William S. Harmsen,
  • Maria D. Hurtado,
  • Donald D. Hensrud,
  • Andres Acosta

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12
p. 100133

Abstract

Read online

Background: Lifestyle interventions (LIs) are the cornerstone for obesity management. The Mayo Clinic Diet (MCD) offers two approaches for LIs: the In-Person LI (IPLI) and the Digital Enhanced LI (DELI). The IPLI includes a 2-day in-person program with monthly follow-ups, whereas the DELI provides on-demand digital tools. The comparative efficacy of these approaches is currently unknown. Methods: This retrospective study included two cohorts of adults with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 kg/m2 and weight metrics at least 3 months after starting either the IPLI or DELI program. The primary endpoint was the total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%) at 6 months. Results: The study included 133 participants in the IPLI cohort (mean age 46.3 years, 65.4 % female, BMI 36.4) and 9603 in the DELI cohort (mean age 60.1 years, 85.0 % female, BMI 33.1). The DELI group achieved superior TBWL% at 1, 3, and 6 months compared to the IPLI group (3.4 % vs. 1.5 %, 4.7 % vs. 2.4 %, 5.3 % vs. 2.9 %, respectively; p 5 % TBWL at 6 months (OR 1.66; 95 % CI [1.08, 2.55], p < 0.023). Conclusion: The DELI approach resulted in superior weight loss outcomes compared to the IPLI. Further research is needed to explore how digital tools can improve weight loss effectiveness.

Keywords