PLoS ONE (Jan 2018)

Fluid administration rate for uncontrolled intraabdominal hemorrhage in swine.

  • Ujwal R Yanala,
  • Jason M Johanning,
  • Iraklis I Pipinos,
  • Robin R High,
  • Gustavo Larsen,
  • William H Velander,
  • Mark A Carlson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207708
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 11
p. e0207708

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundWe hypothesized that slow crystalloid resuscitation would result in less blood loss and a smaller hemoglobin decrease compared to a rapid resuscitation during uncontrolled hemorrhage.MethodsAnesthetized, splenectomized domestic swine underwent hepatic lobar hemitransection. Lactated Ringers was given at 150 or 20 mL/min IV (rapid vs. slow, respectively, N = 12 per group; limit of 100 mL/kg). Primary endpoints were blood loss and serum hemoglobin; secondary endpoints included survival, vital signs, coagulation parameters, and blood gases.ResultsThe slow group had a less blood loss (1.6 vs. 2.7 L, respectively) and a higher final hemoglobin concentration (6.0 vs. 3.4 g/dL).ConclusionsUsing a fixed volume of crystalloid resuscitation in this porcine model of uncontrolled intraabdominal hemorrhage, a slow IV infusion rate produced less blood loss and a smaller hemoglobin decrease compared to rapid infusion.