The attitudinal space framework: Embracing the multidimensionality of attitudinal diversity
Ugo Arbieu,
Jörg Albrecht,
Katrin Böhning-Gaese,
Lisa Lehnen,
Matthias Schleuning,
Thomas Mueller
Affiliations
Ugo Arbieu
Laboratoire d’Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, IDEEV, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA; Corresponding author
Jörg Albrecht
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Lisa Lehnen
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Matthias Schleuning
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Thomas Mueller
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Summary: Attitude polarization describes an increasing attitude difference between groups and is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional phenomenon. However, a unified framework to study polarization across multiple dimensions is lacking. We introduce the attitudinal space framework (ASF) to fully quantify attitudinal diversity. We highlight two key measures—attitudinal extremization and attitudinal dispersion—to quantify across- and within-group attitudinal patterns. First, we show that affective polarization in the US electorate is weaker than previously thought based on mean differences alone: in both Democrat and Republican partisans, attitudinal dispersion increased between 1988 and 2008. Second, we examined attitudes toward wolves in Germany. Despite attitude differences between regions with and without wolves, we did not find differences in attitudinal extremization or dispersion, suggesting only weak attitude polarization. These results illustrate how the ASF is applicable to a wide range of social systems and offers an important avenue to understanding societal transformations.