Sports (Dec 2018)

Similar Strength and Power Adaptations between Two Different Velocity-Based Training Regimens in Collegiate Female Volleyball Players

  • Jacob T. Rauch,
  • Irineu Loturco,
  • Nicholas Cheesman,
  • Justin Thiel,
  • Michael Alvarez,
  • Nicholas Miller,
  • Nathan Carpenter,
  • Christopher Barakat,
  • Gloria Velasquez,
  • Alexandria Stanjones,
  • Daniel Aube,
  • Jody C. Andersen,
  • Eduardo O. De Souza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6040163
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4
p. 163

Abstract

Read online

This study investigated the effects of two different velocity-based training (VBT) regimens on muscular adaptations. Fifteen female college volleyball players were randomly assigned into either progressive velocity-based training (PVBT) or optimum training load (OTL). Both groups trained three times a week for seven weeks. PVBT performed a 4-week strength block (e.g., 0.55⁻0.70 m·s−1) followed by a 3-week power block (e.g., 0.85⁻1.0 m·s−1), whereas OTL performed training at ~0.85⁻0.9 m·s−1. 1RM and peak power output (PP) assessments on the back squat (BS), bench press (BP) and deadlift (DL) exercises were assessed pre and post training. There was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS and BP 1RM, (PVBT: 19.6%, ES: 1.72; OTL: 18.3%, ES: 1.57) and (PVBT: 8.5%, ES: 0.58; OTL: 10.2%, ES: 0.72), respectively. OTL increased DL 1RM to a greater extent than PVBT (p ≤ 0.05), (OTL: 22.9%, ES: 1.49; PVBT: 10.9%, ES: 0.88). Lastly, there was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS, BP and DL PP, (PVBT: 18.3%, ES: 0.86; OTL: 19.8%, ES: 0.79); (PVBT: 14.5%, ES: 0.81; OTL: 27.9%, ES: 1.68); (PVBT: 15.7%, ES: 1.32; OTL: 20.1%, ES: 1.77) respectively. Our data suggest that both VBT regimens are effective for improving muscular performance in college volleyball players during the offseason period.

Keywords