BMC Cancer (Dec 2020)

Relationship between surgical R0 resectability and findings of peripancreatic vascular invasion on CT imaging after neoadjuvant S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

  • Sho Yasuta,
  • Tatsushi Kobayashi,
  • Hidetoshi Aizawa,
  • Shinichiro Takahashi,
  • Masafumi Ikeda,
  • Masaru Konishi,
  • Motohiro Kojima,
  • Hirofumi Kuno,
  • Katsuhiko Uesaka,
  • Soichiro Morinaga,
  • Atsushi Miyamoto,
  • Hirochika Toyama,
  • Norihisa Takakura,
  • Keishi Sugimachi,
  • Wataru Takayama

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07698-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is frequently associated with positive surgical margins and a poor prognosis because the tumor is in contact with major vessels. This study evaluated the relationship between the margin-negative (R0) resection rate and findings indicating peripancreatic vascular invasion on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with BRPC. Methods Twenty-nine BRPC patients who underwent laparotomy after neoadjuvant S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. Peripancreatic major vessel invasion was evaluated based on the length of tumor-vessel contact on MDCT. The R0 resection rates were compared between the progression of vascular invasion (PVI) group and the non-progression of vascular invasion (NVI) group. Results There were 3 patients with partial responses (10%), 25 with stable disease (86%), and 1 with progressive disease (3%) according to the RECISTv1.1 criteria. Regarding vascular invasion, 9 patients (31%) were classified as having PVI, and 20 patients (69%) were classified as having NVI. Of the 29 patients, 27 (93%) received an R0 resection, and all the PVI patients received an R0 resection (9/9; R0 resection rate = 100%) while 90% (18/20) of the NVI patients underwent an R0 resection. The exact 95% confidence interval of risk difference between those R0 resection rates was − 10.0% [− 31.7–20.4%]. Conclusions Patients with BRPC after NACRT achieved high R0 resection rates regardless of the vascular invasion status. BRPC patients can undergo R0 resections unless progressive disease is observed after NACRT. Trial registration UMIN-CTR, UMIN000009172 . Registered 23 October 2012

Keywords