Heliyon (May 2024)

Prediction of small intracranial aneurysm rupture status based on combined Clinical–Radiomics model

  • Yu Ye,
  • Jiao Chen,
  • Xiaoming Qiu,
  • Jun Chen,
  • Xianfang Ming,
  • Zhen Wang,
  • Xin Zhou,
  • Lei Song

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 9
p. e30214

Abstract

Read online

Background: Accumulating small unruptured intracranial aneurysms are detected due to the improved quality and higher frequency of cranial imaging, but treatment remains controversial. While surgery or endovascular treatment is effective for small aneurysms with a high risk of rupture, such interventions are unnecessary for aneurysms with a low risk of rupture. Consequently, it is imperative to accurately identify small aneurysms with a low risk of rupture. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinically practical model to predict small aneurysm ruptures based on a radiomics signature and clinical risk factors. Methods: A total of 293 patients having an aneurysm with a diameter of less than 5 mm, including 199 patients (67.9 %) with a ruptured aneurysm and 94 patients (32.1 %) without a ruptured aneurysm, were included in this study. Digital subtraction angiography or surgical treatment was required in all cases. Data on the clinical risk factors and the features on computed tomography angiography images associated with the aneurysm rupture status were collected simultaneously. We developed a clinical–radiomics model to predict aneurysm rupture status using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The combined clinical–radiomics model was constructed by nomogram analysis. The diagnostic performance, clinical utility, and model calibration were evaluated by operating characteristic curve analysis, decision curve analysis, and calibration analysis. Results: A combined clinical–radiomics model (Area Under Curve [AUC], 0.85; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.757–0.947) showed effective performance in the operating characteristic curve analysis. In the validation cohort, the performance of the combined model was better than that of the radiomics model (AUC, 0.75; 95 % CI, 0.645–0.865; Delong's test p-value = 0.01) and the clinical model (AUC, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.625–0.851; Delong's test p-value <0.01) alone. The results of the decision curve, nomogram, and calibration analyses demonstrated the clinical utility and good fitness of the combined model. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the effectiveness of a clinical–radiomics model for predicting rupture status in small aneurysms.