Impact of delayed intervention following admission for small bowel obstruction: A contemporary analysis

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of surgical intervention for small bowel obstruction (SBO) remains debated. Methods: All adults admitted for SBO were identified in the 2018–2019 National Inpatient Sample. Patients undergoing small bowel resection or lysis of adhesion after three days were considered part of the Delayed cohort. All others were classified as Early. Multivariable regressions were used to assess independent predictors of delayed surgical intervention as well as associations between delayed management and in-hospital mortality, major adverse events (MAE), perioperative complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs and non-home discharge. Results: Among 28,440 patients who met study criteria, 52.0 % underwent delayed intervention. Black race (AOR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.03–1.36, ref.: White) and Medicare coverage (AOR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.01–1.33, ref.: private payer) were associated with increased odds of delayed surgical management. While delayed intervention was not significantly associated with death (AOR 1.27, 95 % CI 0.97–1.68), it was linked to greater odds of MAE (AOR 1.30, 95 % CI 1.16–1.45) and several perioperative complications. The Delayed cohort also faced an incremental increase in postoperative LOS (+1.29 days, 95 % CI 0.89–1.70) and hospitalization costs (+$11,000, 95 % CI 10,000-12,000). Moreover, delayed intervention was linked to increased odds of non-home discharge (AOR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.47–1.84). Conclusions: Delay in surgical management following SBO is linked to inferior clinical outcomes and increased resource use. Our findings highlight the need to ensure proper timing of surgery for SBO as well as efforts to standardize these practices across all demographics of patients.

Keywords

• Small bowel obstruction
• Outcomes
• Delay
• Delayed intervention