International Journal of COPD (Jan 2022)
Diaphragm Ultrasound is an Imaging Biomarker that Distinguishes Exacerbation Status from Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Abstract
Tai Joon An,1 Yeun Jie Yoo,2 Jeong Uk Lim,1 Wan Seo,3 Chan Kwon Park,1 Chin Kook Rhee,4 Hyoung Kyu Yoon1 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea; 3Department of Internal Medicine, St. Peter’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea; 4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, KoreaCorrespondence: Hyoung Kyu Yoon Tel +82 2-3779-2213Email [email protected]: Evaluating the diaphragm muscle in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important. However, the role of diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) in distinguishing the exacerbation status of COPD (AECOPD) is not fully understood. We set this study to evaluate the role of DUS as a biomarker for distinguishing the AECOPD.Methods: COPD patients who underwent DUS were enrolled between March 2020 and November 2020. The diaphragm thickening fraction (TFmax) and diaphragm excursion (DEmax) during maximal deep breathing were measured. Patients were divided into exacerbation and stable groups. Demographics, lung function, and DUS findings were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve and univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled. The exacerbation group had a lower body mass index (BMI) (20.9 vs 24.2, p = 0.003), lower TFmax (94.8 ± 8.2% vs 158.4 ± 83.5%, p = 0.010), and lower DEmax (30.8 ± 11.1 mm vs 40.5 ± 12.5 mm, p = 0.007) compared to stable group. The areas under the TFmax (0.745) and DEmax (0.721) curves indicated fair results for distinguishing AECOPD. The patients were divided into low and high TFmax and DEmax groups based on calculated cut-off values. Low TFmax (odds ratio [OR] 8.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55– 45.56) and low DEmax (OR 11.51; 95% CI 1.15– 115.56) were associated with AECOPD after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and lung functions.Conclusion: DUS showed the possibility of an imaging biomarker distinguishing AECOPD from stable status.Keywords: COPD, exacerbation, diaphragm, ultrasound, biomarker
