Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of Supplementary Parenteral Nutrition in ICU Patients

Abstract

Deying Xiao,1,2,* Long Xie,1,* Wenhong Lin,1 Jinhua Fu,1 Lin Deng,1 Qian Zhuang,2,3 Maobai Liu2,3 1Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000, People’s Republic of China; 2The School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Maobai Liu; Qian Zhuang, Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xinquan Road, Antai Street, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, People’s Republic of China, Tel [phone], Email [email protected]; [email protected]: This evaluation aims to provide a reference for clinical decision-making regarding the use of SPN in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the quality of clinical practice guidelines for the use of supplementary parenteral nutrition (SPN) in ICU patients, both domestically and internationally.Patients and Methods: The quality of clinical practice recommendations for SPN use in ICU patients was assessed using a systematic approach.Results: Five nutrition recommendations in total were included for analysis. The average standardized scores for the recommendations across the six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) are as follows: Scope and purpose scored 87.96%, stakeholder Involvement scored 68.52%, rigour of development scored 73.40%, clarity of presentation scored 84.80%, applicability scored 64.72%, and editorial independence scored 91.10%. In the comprehensive evaluation, two guidelines were rated as grade A recommendations, and three were rated as grade B recommendations. Most guidelines recommended against early use of SPN when energy and protein requirements could not be met solely through enteral nutrition (EN) in ICU patients. The guidelines emphasized achieving target energy levels and discontinuing parenteral nutrition (PN) as soon as the energy requirements were met to prevent overfeeding.Conclusion: This study utilized the AGREE II scale to assess the quality of five nutrition guidelines. All 5 guidelines were deemed acceptable Recommendations include focusing on participants, rigour, and applicability to enhance guideline quality. Clinicians should exercise professional judgment when applying guidelines as they complement training and judgment, rather than replacing them.Keywords: ICU, patients, supplementary parenteral nutrition, clinical practice guidelines, guideline evaluation

Keywords

• icu
• patients
• supplementary parenteral nutrition
• clinical practice guidelines
• guideline evaluation