Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology (Nov 2023)

Abstract 230: Endovascular therapy for large core ischemic strokes: Meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials

  • Mohammad Hossein Abbasi,
  • Ashkan Shoamanesh,
  • David S. Liebeskind,
  • Steven Warach,
  • Hamidreza Saber

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.230
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. S2

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Background: Patients with acute strokes with large infarct size are traditionally excluded from endovascular therapies, as like as clinical care. However, questions remain with respect to the safety and efficacy of EVT in these patients. Methods We conducted a meta‐analysis based on pooled data from SELECT 2 trial [1], ANGEL‐ASPECT trial [2], RESCUE Japan [3], and HERMES study [4]. We explored the efficacy of EVT for large infarcts to achieve a favorable 90‐day modified Rankin Scale. Also, we compared favorable outcomes following EVT in those with a core infarct at baseline of more than 70 ml, delayed thrombectomy of more than 6 hours, older than 75 years, and those who received concomitant IV thrombolysis. We also examined the pooled rate of hemorrhagic transformation following EVT in large core strokes. Results This meta‐analysis showed a statistically significant higher rate of favorable outcome in subjects with extremely large infarct size who undergone EVT compared to those who were managed by medical therapy alone (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: [1.05‐1.98], p: 0.03). In the subgroups of patients with core size > 70ml (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: [1.23‐1.87]), late window presentation (LKN to randomization ≥ 6 hours), (RR: 1.53, 95% CI: [1.27‐1.84]), or those 75 or older than 75 years old (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: [1.12‐1.84]), EVT was associated with higher rates of favorable 90‐day mRS score of 0‐3 compared to medical therapy alone. However, EVT was not associated with better outcomes in those who received IV thrombolysis (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: [0.93‐2.01]. Based on pooled data from SELECT‐2, ANGEL‐ASPECT, and RESCUE Japan trials, the overall rate of early symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation among cases with ASPECT 0‐5 in the thrombectomy group was not significantly higher compared to patients who were managed non‐surgically (OR 1.75, 95% CI: [0.89‐3.47]). Conclusion Endovascular therapy is a reasonable option for the management of large infarcts. EVT results in favorable outcome by a delayed thrombectomy for a large core infarct and in older patients.