PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Appropriate-for-gestational-age infants who exhibit reduced antenatal growth velocity display postnatal catch-up growth.

  • Emma J McLaughlin,
  • Richard J Hiscock,
  • Alice J Robinson,
  • Lisa Hui,
  • Stephen Tong,
  • Kirsten M Dane,
  • Anna L Middleton,
  • Susan P Walker,
  • Teresa M MacDonald

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238700
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 9
p. e0238700

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundPostnatally, small-for-gestational-age (SGA; birthweight MethodsWe followed-up the infants of women who had previously undergone ultrasound assessment of fetal size at 28- and 36-weeks' gestation, enabling calculation of antenatal growth velocity. To assess postnatal growth, we asked parents to send their infant's growth measurements, up to two years post-birth, which are routinely collected through the state-wide Maternal-Child Health service. Infants with medical conditions affecting postnatal growth were excluded from the analysis. From the measurements obtained we calculated age-adjusted z-scores for postnatal weight, length and body mass index (BMI; weight(kg)/height(m2)) at birth and 4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 months. We used linear spline regression modelling to predict mean weight, length and BMI z-scores at intervals post birth. Predicted mean age-adjusted z-scores were then compared between three groups; SGA, AGA with low antenatal growth (AGA-FGR; loss of >20 customised estimated fetal weight centiles), and AGA-NG to determine if catch-up growth occurred. In addition, we compared the rates of catch-up growth (defined as an increase in weight age-adjusted z-score of ≥0.67 over 1 year) between the groups with Fisher's exact tests.ResultsOf 158 (46%) infant growth records received, 146 were AGA, with low antenatal growth velocity occurring in 34/146 (23.2%). Rates of gestational diabetes and SGA birthweight were higher in those lost to follow-up. Compared to AGA-NG infants, AGA-FGR infants had significantly lower predicted mean weight (pConclusionsAGA infants that have exhibited reduced antenatal fetal growth velocity also exhibit significant catch-up growth in the first 12 months of life. This finding represents further evidence that AGA fetuses that slow in growth during pregnancy do so due to UPI.