Gynecological Cancers Translational, Research Implementation, and Harmonization: Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Consensus and Still Open Questions
Marina Bagnoli,
Ting Yan Shi,
Charlie Gourley,
Paul Speiser,
Alexander Reuss,
Hans W. Nijman,
Carien L. Creutzberg,
Suzy Scholl,
Anastassia Negrouk,
Mark F. Brady,
Kosei Hasegawa,
Katsutoshi Oda,
Iain A. McNeish,
Elise C. Kohn,
Amit M. Oza,
Helen MacKay,
David Millan,
Katherine Bennett,
Clare Scott,
Delia Mezzanzanica
Affiliations
Marina Bagnoli
Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
Ting Yan Shi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Charlie Gourley
University of Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, MRC IGMM, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
Paul Speiser
Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria
Alexander Reuss
Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, at the Philipps-University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
Hans W. Nijman
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
Carien L. Creutzberg
Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
Suzy Scholl
Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
Anastassia Negrouk
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
Mark F. Brady
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
Kosei Hasegawa
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama 1397-1, Japan
Katsutoshi Oda
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
Iain A. McNeish
Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Elise C. Kohn
Clinical Investigations Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
Amit M. Oza
Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
Helen MacKay
Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto/Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
David Millan
Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TR, UK
Katherine Bennett
Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup, Operations, Kingston, ON K7K-7A6, Canada
Clare Scott
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Delia Mezzanzanica
Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
In the era of personalized medicine, the introduction of translational studies in clinical trials has substantially increased their costs, but provides the possibility of improving the productivity of trials with a better selection of recruited patients. With the overall goal of creating a roadmap to improve translational design for future gynecological cancer trials and of defining translational goals, a main discussion was held during a brainstorming day of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Translational Research Committee and overall conclusions are here reported. A particular emphasis was dedicated to the new frontier of the immunoprofiling of gynecological cancers. The discussion pointed out that to maximize patients’ benefit, translational studies should be integral to clinical trial design with standardization and optimization of procedures including a harmonization program of Standard Operating Procedures. Pathology-reviewed sample collection should be mandatory and ensured by dedicated funding. Biomarker validation and development should be made public and transparent to ensure rapid progresses with positive outcomes for patients. Guidelines/templates for patients’ informed consent are needed. Importantly for the public, recognized goals are to increase the involvement of advocates and to improve the reporting of translational data in a forum accessible to patients.