Cancers (Feb 2023)

Characterization of BRCA Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer

  • Giovanna Barbero,
  • Roberta Zuntini,
  • Pamela Magini,
  • Laura Desiderio,
  • Michela Bonaguro,
  • Anna Myriam Perrone,
  • Daniela Rubino,
  • Mina Grippa,
  • Antonio De Leo,
  • Claudio Ceccarelli,
  • Lea Godino,
  • Sara Miccoli,
  • Simona Ferrari,
  • Donatella Santini,
  • Pierandrea De Iaco,
  • Claudio Zamagni,
  • Giovanni Innella,
  • Daniela Turchetti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051530
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 5
p. 1530

Abstract

Read online

BRCA testing is recommended in all Ovarian Cancer (OC) patients, but the optimal approach is debated. The landscape of BRCA alterations was explored in 30 consecutive OC patients: 6 (20.0%) carried germline pathogenic variants, 1 (3.3%) a somatic mutation of BRCA2, 2 (6.7%) unclassified germline variants in BRCA1, and 5 (16.7%) hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter. Overall, 12 patients (40.0%) showed BRCA deficit (BD), due to inactivation of both alleles of either BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 18 (60.0%) had undetected/unclear BRCA deficit (BU). Regarding sequence changes, analysis performed on Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded tissue through a validated diagnostic protocol showed 100% accuracy, compared with 96.3% for Snap-Frozen tissue and 77.8% for the pre-diagnostic Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded protocol. BD tumors, compared to BU, showed a significantly higher rate of small genomic rearrangements. After a median follow-up of 60.3 months, the mean PFS was 54.9 ± 27.2 months in BD patients and 34.6 ± 26.7 months in BU patients (p = 0.055). The analysis of other cancer genes in BU patients identified a carrier of a pathogenic germline variant in RAD51C. Thus, BRCA sequencing alone may miss tumors potentially responsive to specific treatments (due to BRCA1 promoter methylation or mutations in other genes) while unvalidated FFPE approaches may yield false-positive results.

Keywords