Frontiers in Public Health (Jul 2024)
Comparison of multiplex PCR capillary electrophoresis assay and PCR-reverse dot blot assay for human papillomavirus DNA genotyping detection in cervical cancer tissue specimens
Abstract
BackgroundThe study aimed to evaluate the positivity rates and genotype distribution of the multiplex PCR capillary electrophoresis (MPCE) and PCR-Reverse Dot Blot (PCR-RDB) assays for human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in cervical cancer tissue specimens, and to explore their detection principles and applications in large-scale population screening.MethodsThe MPCE and PCR-RDB assays were performed separately on 425 diagnosed cervical cancer tissue specimens. Subsequently, the results of both assays were compared based on the HPV infection positivity rates and genotype distribution.ResultsThe overall positive rates of HPV genotypes for the MPCE and PCR-RDB assays were 97.9% and 92.9%, respectively. A p-value < 0.001 indicated a statistically significance difference in consistency between the two assays. The kappa value was 0.390, indicating that the consistency between both assays was fair. HPV16 was the most common single-genotype infection type, with infection rates detected via MPCE and PCR-RDB assays being 75.7% and 68.3%, respectively. In the age group >50 years, the HPV multiple-type infection rate detected via MPCE assay was significantly higher than that detected by the PCR-RDB assay, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.002).ConclusionTo reduce the false-negative rate and improve screening efficiency, the MPCE assay, which targets the oncogenic gene E6/E7 segments, can be extended to the general female population for the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical cancer.
Keywords
