Diagnostics (Dec 2024)

Fully Automated Assessment of Cardiac Chamber Volumes and Myocardial Mass on Non-Contrast Chest CT with a Deep Learning Model: Validation Against Cardiac MR

  • Ramona Schmitt,
  • Christopher L. Schlett,
  • Jonathan I. Sperl,
  • Saikiran Rapaka,
  • Athira J. Jacob,
  • Manuel Hein,
  • Muhammad Taha Hagar,
  • Philipp Ruile,
  • Dirk Westermann,
  • Martin Soschynski,
  • Fabian Bamberg,
  • Christopher Schuppert

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14242884
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 24
p. 2884

Abstract

Read online

Background: To validate the automated quantification of cardiac chamber volumes and myocardial mass on non-contrast chest CT using cardiac MR (CMR) as a reference. Methods: We retrospectively included 53 consecutive patients who received non-contrast chest CT and CMR within three weeks. A deep learning model created cardiac segmentations on axial soft-tissue reconstructions from CT, covering all four cardiac chambers and the left ventricular myocardium. Segmentations on CMR cine short-axis and long-axis images served as a reference. Standard estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for ventricular volumes at end-diastole and end-systole (LVEDV, LVESV, RVEDV, RVESV), left ventricular mass (LVM), and atrial volumes (LA, RA) at ventricular end-diastole. A qualitative assessment noted segmentation issues. Results: The deep learning model generated CT measurements for 52 of the 53 patients (98%). Based on CMR measurements, the average LVEDV was 166 ± 64 mL, RVEDV was 144 ± 51 mL, and LVM was 115 ± 39 g. The CT measurements correlated well with CMR measurements for LVEDV, LVESV, and LVM (ICC = 0.85, ICC = 0.84, and ICC = 0.91; all p p p Conclusions: Automated cardiac chamber volume and myocardial mass quantification on non-contrast chest CT produced viable measurements in this retrospective sample. Relevance Statement: An automated cardiac assessment on non-contrast chest CT provides quantitative morphological data on the heart, enabling a preliminary organ evaluation that aids in incidentally identifying at-risk patients who may benefit from a more targeted diagnostic workup.

Keywords