BMC Geriatrics (Nov 2022)

Frailty and solid-organ transplant candidates: a scoping review

  • Jonathan Kao,
  • Natasha Reid,
  • Ruth E Hubbard,
  • Ryan Homes,
  • Leila Shafiee Hanjani,
  • Ella Pearson,
  • Benignus Logan,
  • Shannon King,
  • Sarah Fox,
  • Emily H Gordon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03485-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background There is currently no consensus as to a standardized tool for frailty measurement in any patient population. In the solid-organ transplantation population, routinely identifying and quantifying frailty in potential transplant candidates would support patients and the multidisciplinary team to make well-informed, individualized, management decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise the literature regarding frailty measurement in solid-organ transplant (SOT) candidates. Methods A search of four databases (Cochrane, Pubmed, EMBASE and CINAHL) yielded 3124 studies. 101 studies (including heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant candidate populations) met the inclusion criteria. Results We found that studies used a wide range of frailty tools (N = 22), including four ‘established’ frailty tools. The most commonly used tools were the Fried Frailty Phenotype and the Liver Frailty Index. Frailty prevalence estimates for this middle-aged, predominantly male, population varied between 2.7% and 100%. In the SOT candidate population, frailty was found to be associated with a range of adverse outcomes, with most evidence for increased mortality (including post-transplant and wait-list mortality), post-operative complications and prolonged hospitalisation. There is currently insufficient data to compare the predictive validity of frailty tools in the SOT population. Conclusion Overall, there is great variability in the approach to frailty measurement in this population. Preferably, a validated frailty measurement tool would be incorporated into SOT eligibility assessments internationally with a view to facilitating comparisons between patient sub-groups and national and international transplant services with the ultimate goal of improved patient care.

Keywords