Journal of Orthopaedic Translation (Nov 2023)

A systematic investigation of the effects of TGF-β3 and mechanical stimulation on tenogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in a poly(ethylene glycol)/gelatin-based hydrogel

  • Ilze Donderwinkel,
  • Rocky S. Tuan,
  • Neil R. Cameron,
  • Jessica E. Frith

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 43
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Background: High post-surgical failure rates following tendon injury generate high medical costs and poor patient recovery. Cell-based tendon tissue engineering has the potential to produce fully functional replacement tissue and provide new strategies to restore tendon function and healing. In this endeavour, the application of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) encapsulated in biomaterial scaffolds has shown great promise. However, a consensus on optimal promotion of tenogenic differentiation of MSCs has yet to be reached, although growth factors and mechanical cues are generally acknowledged as important factors. Methods: In this study, we prepared a hydrogel cell culture system consisting of methacrylated poly(d,l-lactic acid-ethylene glycol-d,l-lactic acid) (P(LA-EG-LA)) and gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) to encapsulate human bone marrow-derived MSCs (hBMSCs). We further systematically investigated the influence of static and intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain mechanical stimulation, in combination with transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3) supplementation, on tenogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Results: Increased TGF-β3 concentration upregulated the tenogenic genes Scleraxis (SCX) and collagen type I (COL1A1) but showed no effects on tenascin-c (TNC) and collagen type III (COL3A1) expression. Mechanical stimulation had no observable effect on gene expression, but intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain stimulation improved matrix deposition. Together, these data provide new insights into how TGF-β3 and mechanical stimulation regulate MSC tenogenesis, with TGF-β3 promoting the expression of key tenogenic genes whilst mechanical stimulation aided matrix deposition in the engineered tissue. Furthermore, intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain at 3% elongation and 0.33 ​Hz for 1 ​h/day showed improved matrix effects compared to static strain. Conclusion: Together, the most promising result for tenogenic differentiation of hBMSCs was identified as treatment with 5 ​ng/ml TGF-β3 under intermittent cyclic uniaxial strain (3% strain; 0.33 ​Hz; 1 ​h/day). This knowledge is of importance for the development of an improved protocol for tenogenic differentiation of MSCs and thereby for tendon tissue engineering. The translational potential of this article: Tissue-engineered strategies for tendon repair require a consensus on the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells to tenocytes, which is currently lacking. This article provides a systematic investigation of two main tenogenic differentiation conditions to further development of a tenogenic differentiation protocol.

Keywords