International Journal of Infectious Diseases (Mar 2023)

Multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study of the efficacy and safety of favipiravir and nafamostat mesilate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

  • Mahoko Ikeda,
  • Shu Okugawa,
  • Kosuke Kashiwabara,
  • Takashi Moritoyo,
  • Yoshiaki Kanno,
  • Daisuke Jubishi,
  • Hideki Hashimoto,
  • Koh Okamoto,
  • Kenji Tsushima,
  • Yasuki Uchida,
  • Takahiro Mitsumura,
  • Hidetoshi Igari,
  • Takeya Tsutsumi,
  • Hideki Araoka,
  • Kazuhiro Yatera,
  • Yoshihiro Yamamoto,
  • Yuki Nakamura,
  • Amato Otani,
  • Marie Yamashita,
  • Yuji Wakimoto,
  • Takayuki Shinohara,
  • Maho Adachi-Katayama,
  • Tatsunori Oyabu,
  • Aoi Kanematsu,
  • Sohei Harada,
  • Yuichiro Takeshita,
  • Yasutaka Nakano,
  • Yasunari Miyazaki,
  • Seiichiro Sakao,
  • Makoto Saito,
  • Sho Ogura,
  • Kei Yamasaki,
  • Hitoshi Kawasuji,
  • Osamu Hataji,
  • Jun-Ichiro Inoue,
  • Yasuyuki Seto,
  • Kyoji Moriya

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 128
pp. 355 – 363

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat combined with favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel assignment study in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive favipiravir alone (n = 24) or nafamostat with favipiravir (n = 21). The outcomes included changes in the World Health Organization clinical progression scale score, time to improvement in body temperature, and improvement in oxygen saturation (SpO2). Results: There was no significant difference in the changes in the clinical progression scale between nafamostat with favipiravir and favipiravir alone groups (median, -0.444 vs -0.150, respectively; least-squares mean difference, -0.294; P = 0.364). The time to improvement in body temperature was significantly shorter in the combination group (5.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-7.0) than in the favipiravir group (9.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 7.0-18.0; P =0.009). The changes in SpO2 were greater in the combination group than in the favipiravir group (0.526% vs -1.304%, respectively; least-squares mean difference, 1.831; P = 0.022). No serious adverse events or deaths were reported, but phlebitis occurred in 57.1% of the patients in the combination group. Conclusion: Although our study showed no differences in clinical progression, earlier defervescence, and recovery of SpO2 were observed in the combination group.

Keywords