Frontiers in Psychiatry (Mar 2022)

Trajectories of Adaptive Behaviors During Childhood in Females and Males in the General Population

  • Tomoko Nishimura,
  • Tomoko Nishimura,
  • Takeo Kato,
  • Takeo Kato,
  • Akemi Okumura,
  • Akemi Okumura,
  • Taeko Harada,
  • Taeko Harada,
  • Toshiki Iwabuchi,
  • Toshiki Iwabuchi,
  • Md. Shafiur Rahman,
  • Md. Shafiur Rahman,
  • Tomoya Hirota,
  • Tomoya Hirota,
  • Michio Takahashi,
  • Masaki Adachi,
  • Hitoshi Kuwabara,
  • Hitoshi Kuwabara,
  • Shu Takagai,
  • Yoko Nomura,
  • Yoko Nomura,
  • Nagahide Takahashi,
  • Nagahide Takahashi,
  • Atsushi Senju,
  • Atsushi Senju,
  • Kenji J. Tsuchiya,
  • Kenji J. Tsuchiya

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.817383
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

Little is known about the trajectory patterns and sex differences in adaptive behaviors in the general population. We examined the trajectory classes of adaptive behaviors using a representative sample and examined whether the class structure and trajectory patterns differed between females and males. We further explored sex differences in neurodevelopmental traits in each latent class. Participants (n = 994) were children in the Hamamatsu Birth Cohort for Mothers and Children (HBC Study)—a prospective birth cohort study. Adaptive behaviors in each domain of communication, daily living skills, and socialization were evaluated at five time points when participants were 2.7, 3.5, 4.5, 6, and 9 years old using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–Second Edition. Parallel process multigroup latent class growth analysis extracted sex-specific trajectory classes. Neurodevelopmental traits of children at age 9, autistic traits, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) traits, and cognitive ability were examined for females and males in each identified class. A 4-class model demonstrated the best fit. Moreover, a 4-class model that allowed for differences in class probabilities and means of growth parameters between females and males provided a better fit than a model assuming no sex differences. In the communication domain, females scored higher than their male counterparts in all four classes. In the daily living skills and socialization domains, the two higher adaptive classes (Class 1: females, 18.6%; males, 17.8%; Class 2: females, 48.8%; males, 49.8%) had similar trajectories for males and females, whereas in the two lower adaptive behavior classes (Class 3: females, 27.5%; males, 29.4%; Class 4: females, 5.1%; males, 3.0%), females had higher adaptive scores than their male counterparts. In Class 4, females were more likely to have autistic and ADHD traits exceeding the cutoffs, while males were more likely to have below-average IQ. Different trajectories in females and males suggest that adaptive skills may require adjustment based on the sex of the child, when standardizing scores, in order to achieve better early detection of skill impairment.

Keywords