PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Real-world outcomes with ranibizumab in branch retinal vein occlusion: The prospective, global, LUMINOUS study.

  • Ian Pearce,
  • Andreas Clemens,
  • Michael H Brent,
  • Lin Lu,
  • Roberto Gallego-Pinazo,
  • Angelo Maria Minnella,
  • Catherine Creuzot-Garcher,
  • Georg Spital,
  • Taiji Sakamoto,
  • Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf,
  • Ian L McAllister,
  • all the LUMINOUS™ study investigators

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234739
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 6
p. e0234739

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in treatment-naïve patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) enrolled in the LUMINOUS™ study.Study designA 5-year, global, prospective, multicenter, observational, open-label study conducted in a clinical practice (real-world) setting at outpatient ophthalmology clinics that recruited 30,138 consenting adult patients from all approved indications for ranibizumab across 42 countries. Patients with BRVO were treated according to the local ranibizumab label of the participating countries. Mean change in visual acuity (VA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters from baseline to Year 1, treatment exposure during Year 1, and adverse events (AEs) over 5 years were assessed.ResultsOf the 1366 recruited BRVO patients, 405 were treatment-naïve at baseline with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 67.9 (12.5) years, 57.5% were female, and 71.8% were White. At Year 1 (n = 189), the mean (SD) VA gain was 11.9 (17.66) letters from a baseline of 49.2 (±20.32) letters with a mean (SD) of 5.0 (2.34) injections. VA gains were higher in patients (n = 83) who received 6-9 injections (13.6 [20.16] letters) than in those who received 2-5 injections (n = 92, 11.7 [15.43] letters), or 1 injection (n = 14, 3.6 [13.72] letters). Patients with baseline VA ConclusionsOne year results from the LUMINOUS real-world study showed a clinically meaningful VA improvement with ranibizumab in treatment-naïve patients with BRVO; numerically higher VA gains were achieved in patients who received more injections and those with poor baseline VA. No new safety signals were observed.