Concise Review: Patency of Small‐Diameter Tissue‐Engineered Vascular Grafts: A Meta‐Analysis of Preclinical Trials

Abstract

Abstract Several patient groups undergoing small‐diameter (rabbit]; 873 TEVGs) meeting the inclusion criteria. Preclinical trials represented low to medium risk of bias, and binary logistic regression revealed that patency was significantly affected by recellularization, TEVG length, TEVG diameter, surface modification, and preconditioning. In contrast, scaffold types were less important. The patency was 63.5%, 89%, and 100% for TEVGs with a median diameter of 3 mm, 4 mm, and 5 mm, respectively. In the group of recellularized TEVGs, patency was not improved by using smooth muscle cells in addition to endothelial cells nor affected by the endothelial origin, but seems to benefit from a long‐term (46–240 hours) recellularization time. Finally, data showed that median TEVG length (5 cm) and median follow‐up (56 days) used in preclinical settings are relatively inadequate for direct clinical translation. In conclusion, our data imply that future studies should consider a TEVG design that at least includes endothelial recellularization and bioreactor preconditioning, and we suggest that more standard guidelines for testing and reporting TEVGs in large animals should be considered to enable interstudy comparisons and favor a robust and reproducible outcome as well as clinical translation.

Keywords

• Revascularization
• Bypass
• Tissue‐engineered vascular grafts
• Patency
• Meta‐analysis