Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Jun 2023)

A new process-based and scale-aware desert dust emission scheme for global climate models – Part I: Description and evaluation against inverse modeling emissions

  • D. M. Leung,
  • J. F. Kok,
  • L. Li,
  • G. S. Okin,
  • C. Prigent,
  • M. Klose,
  • C. Pérez García-Pando,
  • C. Pérez García-Pando,
  • L. Menut,
  • N. M. Mahowald,
  • D. M. Lawrence,
  • M. Chamecki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6487-2023
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23
pp. 6487 – 6523

Abstract

Read online

Desert dust accounts for most of the atmosphere's aerosol burden by mass and produces numerous important impacts on the Earth system. However, current global climate models (GCMs) and land-surface models (LSMs) struggle to accurately represent key dust emission processes, in part because of inadequate representations of soil particle sizes that affect the dust emission threshold, surface roughness elements that absorb wind momentum, and boundary-layer characteristics that control wind fluctuations. Furthermore, because dust emission is driven by small-scale (∼ 1 km or smaller) processes, simulating the global cycle of desert dust in GCMs with coarse horizontal resolutions (∼ 100 km) presents a fundamental challenge. This representation problem is exacerbated by dust emission fluxes scaling nonlinearly with wind speed above a threshold wind speed that is sensitive to land-surface characteristics. Here, we address these fundamental problems underlying the simulation of dust emissions in GCMs and LSMs by developing improved descriptions of (1) the effect of soil texture on the dust emission threshold, (2) the effects of nonerodible roughness elements (both rocks and green vegetation) on the surface wind stress, and (3) the effects of boundary-layer turbulence on driving intermittent dust emissions. We then use the resulting revised dust emission parameterization to simulate global dust emissions in a standalone model forced by reanalysis meteorology and land-surface fields. We further propose (4) a simple methodology to rescale lower-resolution dust emission simulations to match the spatial variability of higher-resolution emission simulations in GCMs. The resulting dust emission simulation shows substantially improved agreement against regional dust emissions observationally constrained by inverse modeling. We thus find that our revised dust emission parameterization can substantially improve dust emission simulations in GCMs and LSMs.