Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Jun 2023)

Autologous Skin Grafts, versus Tissue-engineered Skin Constructs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Sara Kianian, MTM, BA,
  • Kelley Zhao, BS,
  • Jasleen Kaur, BS,
  • Kimberly W. Lu, BS,
  • Sourish Rathi, BS,
  • Kanad Ghosh, MD, BA,
  • Hunter Rogoff, BS,
  • Thomas R. Hays, MD, BS,
  • Jason Park, MD,
  • Miriam Rafailovich, PhD,
  • Marcia Simon, PhD,
  • Duc T. Bui, MD,
  • Sami U. Khan, MD, FACS,
  • Alexander B. Dagum, MD, FACS, FRCS(C),
  • Gurtej Singh, PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005100
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 6
p. e5100

Abstract

Read online

Background:. For over 100 years, autologous skin grafts have remained the gold standard for the reconstruction of wounds but are limited in availability. Acellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (acellular TCs) and cellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (cellular TCs) may address these limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare outcomes between them. Methods:. A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, querying MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane to assess graft incorporation, failure, and wound healing. Case reports/series, reviews, in vitro/in vivo work, non-English articles or articles without full text were excluded. Results:. Sixty-six articles encompassing 4076 patients were included. No significant differences were found between graft failure rates (P = 0.07) and mean difference of percent reepithelialization (p = 0.92) when split-thickness skin grafts were applied alone versus co-grafted with acellular TCs. Similar mean Vancouver Scar Scale was found for these two groups (p = 0.09). Twenty-one studies used at least one cellular TC. Weighted averages from pooled results did not reveal statistically significant differences in mean reepithelialization or failure rates for epidermal cellular TCs compared with split-thickness skin grafts (p = 0.55). Conclusions:. This systematic review is the first to illustrate comparable functional and wound healing outcomes between split-thickness skin grafts alone and those co-grafted with acellular TCs. The use of cellular TCs seems promising from preliminary findings. However, these results are limited in clinical applicability due to the heterogeneity of study data, and further level 1 evidence is required to determine the safety and efficacy of these constructs.