Orthopaedic Surgery (Aug 2024)

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict the Risk of Blood Transfusion after Total Hip Replacement in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Jieyang Zhu,
  • Chenxi Xu,
  • Yi Jiang,
  • Jinyu Zhu,
  • Mengyun Tu,
  • Xiaobing Yan,
  • Zeren Shen,
  • Zhenqi Lou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14160
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 8
pp. 2066 – 2080

Abstract

Read online

Objective Total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains the primary treatment option for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. This study aims to explore the risk factors associated with allogeneic blood transfusion after surgery and to develop a dynamic prediction model to predict post‐operative blood transfusion requirements. This will provide more accurate guidance for perioperative humoral management and rational allocation of medical resources. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 829 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures at three third‐class hospitals between January 2017 and August 2023. Patient data from one hospital were used for model development, whereas data from the other two hospitals were used for external validation. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the characteristic subsets related to blood transfusion. Various machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, SVA (support vector machine), K‐NN (k‐nearest neighbors), MLP (multilayer perceptron), naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting, were used to process the data and construct prediction models. A 10‐fold cross‐validation algorithm facilitated the comparison of the predictive performance of the models, resulting in the selection of the best‐performing model for the development of an open‐source computing program. Results BMI (body mass index), surgical duration, IBL (intraoperative blood loss), anticoagulant history, utilization rate of tranexamic acid, Pre‐Hb, and Pre‐ALB were included in the model as well as independent risk factors. The average area under curve (AUC) values for each model were as follows: logistic regression (0.98); SVA (0.91); k‐NN (0.87) MLP, (0.96); naive Bayes (0.97); decision tree (0.87); random forest (0.96); and gradient boosting (0.97). A web calculator based on the best model is available at: (https://nomo99.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/). Conclusion Utilizing a computer algorithm, a prediction model with a high discrimination accuracy (AUC > 0.5) was developed. The logistic regression model demonstrated superior differentiation and reliability, thereby successfully passing external validation. The model's strong generalizability and applicability have significant implications for clinicians, aiding in the identification of patients at high risk for postoperative blood transfusion.

Keywords