BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (Jun 2024)

Left ventricular geometry characteristics and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

  • Yi Zhang,
  • Xiaofei Guo,
  • Sijiao Chen,
  • Yin Wang,
  • Jingjing Li,
  • Xiaofeng Sun,
  • Xiaomei Huang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03985-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The relationships among left heart remodeling, cardiac function, and cardiovascular events (CEs) in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remain unclear. We evaluated the echocardiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of such patients with diverse left ventricular geometric (LVG) configurations. Methods Overall, 210 patients with HFpEF undergoing MHD (cases) and 60 healthy controls were enrolled. Cases were divided into four subgroups based on LVG and were followed up for three years. The primary outcomes were the first CEs and all-cause mortality. Results Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and right ventricular systolic function did significantly differ between cases and controls, whereas echocardiographic parameters of cardiac structure, diastolic function, and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) differed significantly. The proportion of cases with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was 67.1%. In addition, 2.38%, 21.90%, 12.86%, and 62.86% of cases presented with normal geometry (NG), concentric remodeling (CR), eccentric hypertrophy (EH), and concentric hypertrophy (CH), respectively. The left atrial diameter (LAD) was the largest and cardiac output index was the lowest in the EH subgroup. The score of Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Workgroup (ADQI) HF class was worse in the EH subgroup than in other subgroups at baseline. The proportions of cases free of adverse CEs in the EH subgroup at 12, 24, and 36 months were 40.2%, 14.8%, and 0%, respectively, and the survival rates were 85.2%, 29.6%, 3.7%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in other subgroups. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that age, TNI (Troponin I), EH, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), age and EH configuration were independent risk factors for adverse CEs and all-cause mortality in the cases. Conclusion Most patients with HFpEF receiving MHD have LVH and diastolic dysfunction. Among the four LVGs, patients with HFpEF undergoing MHD who exhibited EH had the highest risk of adverse CEs and all-cause mortality.

Keywords