BMC Biomedical Engineering (Mar 2024)

Needle artifact reduction during interventional CT procedures using a silver filter

  • Carlos A. Reynoso-Mejia,
  • Jonathan Troville,
  • Martin G. Wagner,
  • Bernice Hoppel,
  • Fred T. Lee,
  • Timothy P. Szczykutowicz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42490-024-00076-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background MAR algorithms have not been productized in interventional imaging because they are too time-consuming. Application of a beam hardening filter can mitigate metal artifacts and doesn’t increase computational burden. We evaluate the ability to reduce metal artifacts of a 0.5 mm silver (Ag) additional filter in a Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) scanner during CT-guided biopsy procedures. Methods A biopsy needle was positioned inside the lung field of an anthropomorphic phantom (Lungman, Kyoto Kagaku, Kyoto, Japan). CT acquisitions were performed with beam energies of 100 kV, 120 kV, 135 kV, and 120 kV with the Ag filter and reconstructed using a filtered back projection algorithm. For each measurement, the CTDIvol was kept constant at 1 mGy. Quantitative profiles placed in three regions of the artifact (needle, needle tip, and trajectory artifacts) were used to obtain metrics (FWHM, FWTM, width at − 100 HU, and absolute error in HU) to evaluate the blooming artifact, artifact width, change in CT number, and artifact range. An image quality analysis was carried out through image noise measurement. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to find significant differences between the conventional CT beam energies and the Ag filtered 120 kV beam. Results The 120 kV-Ag is shown to have the shortest range of artifacts compared to the other beam energies. For needle tip and trajectory artifacts, a significant reduction of − 53.6% (p 0.05) in image noise between the conventional energies and the 120 kV-Ag were found. Conclusions A 0.5 mm Ag additional MDCT filter demonstrated consistent metal artifact reduction generated by the biopsy needle. This reduction may lead to a better depiction of the target and surrounding structures while maintaining image quality.

Keywords