Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra (Feb 2018)

Automatic MRI Quantifying Methods in Behavioral-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Diagnosis

  • Antti Cajanus,
  • Anette Hall,
  • Juha Koikkalainen,
  • Eino Solje,
  • Antti Tolonen,
  • Timo Urhemaa,
  • Yawu Liu,
  • Ramona M. Haanpää,
  • Päivi Hartikainen,
  • Seppo Helisalmi,
  • Ville Korhonen,
  • Daniel Rueckert,
  • Steen Hasselbalch,
  • Gunhild Waldemar,
  • Patrizia Mecocci,
  • Ritva Vanninen,
  • Mark van Gils,
  • Hilkka Soininen,
  • Jyrki Lötjönen,
  • Anne M. Remes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000486849
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 51 – 59

Abstract

Read online

Aims: We assessed the value of automated MRI quantification methods in the differential diagnosis of behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from Alzheimer disease (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), and subjective memory complaints (SMC). We also examined the role of the C9ORF72-related genetic status in the differentiation sensitivity. Methods: The MRI scans of 50 patients with bvFTD (17 C9ORF72 expansion carriers) were analyzed using 6 quantification methods as follows: voxel-based morphometry (VBM), tensor-based morphometry, volumetry (VOL), manifold learning, grading, and white-matter hyperintensities. Each patient was then individually compared to an independent reference group in order to attain diagnostic suggestions. Results: Only VBM and VOL showed utility in correctly identifying bvFTD from our set of data. The overall classification sensitivity of bvFTD with VOL + VBM achieved a total sensitivity of 60%. Using VOL + VBM, 32% were misclassified as having LBD. There was a trend of higher values for classification sensitivity of the C9ORF72 expansion carriers than noncarriers. Conclusion: VOL, VBM, and their combination are effective in differential diagnostics between bvFTD and AD or SMC. However, MRI atrophy profiles for bvFTD and LBD are too similar for a reliable differentiation with the quantification methods tested in this study.

Keywords