PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Exploring dual career quality implementation at European higher education institutions: Insights from university experts

  • Pascal Izzicupo,
  • Angela Di Baldassarre,
  • Barbara Ghinassi,
  • Ilvis Abelkalns,
  • Ugis Bisenieks,
  • Antonio Sánchez-Pato,
  • Francisco José Cánovas-Alvarez,
  • António J. Figueiredo,
  • Juan Alfonso García-Roca,
  • Alejandro Leiva-Arcas,
  • Lourdes Meroño,
  • Anda Paegle,
  • Liliana-Elisabeta Radu,
  • Cristian-Mihail Rus,
  • Oana-Mihaela Rusu,
  • Hugo Sarmento,
  • Janis Stonis,
  • Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal,
  • Vasco Vaz,
  • Mojca Doupona,
  • Laura Capranica

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 11

Abstract

Read online

Introduction This paper examines the convergence of the opinions of European higher education institution (HEI) experts on possible implementation of dual career policies and provision areas at university level. Methods An online 32-item questionnaire encompassing 26 dual career aspects collected the opinion of European HEI experts as the last phase of a Delphi method preceded by i) focus groups with student-athletes who aimed to identify needs for dual careers and ii) a workshop with 21 dual career experts to generate the statements to be included in the survey. Seventy-one HEI experts from 12 EU member states participated in the survey, rating each dual career aspect identified in previous phases. Results The relative position of each aspect has been plotted based on relevance (x-axis) and feasibility (y-axis). The Quadrant IV of the resulting scatterplots identified the following nine aspects rated as highly relevant and highly feasible for implementation: tutorship/mentorship, psychological support, programmes based on integration of academic departments and sports services, and adaptable programmes to the needs of each student-athletes (assistance/tutorship area), individual study plans and distance learning (curricula requirements area), publicity for student-athletes and initiatives for increasing the awareness of student-athletes and knowledge of dual career issues (social support area), and access to educational facilities (logistic support area). Discussion and conclusions The HEI experts’ views represent a coherent and useful starting point to develop a deep understanding of the considered 26 aspects founded on a phenomenological lifeworld-led approach and emphasizes the need for a minimum standard for dual career policies and provisions.