A Comparative Study of the Treatment Efficiency of Floating and Constructed Wetlands for the Bioremediation of Phenanthrene-Contaminated Water

Abstract

Employing floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) and constructed wetlands (CWs) is one of the most eco-friendly strategies for the bioremediation of water contaminants. Here, the efficiency of FTWs and CWs was compared for the degradation of phenanthrene-contaminated water for the first time. The FTWs and CWs were established by vegetated Phragmites australis in phenanthrene (1000 mg L−1)-contaminated water. Both wetlands were augmented with a bacterial consortium of four bacterial strains: Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN, Pseudomonas anguiliseptica ITRI53, Arthrobacter oxydans ITRH49, and Achromobacter xylosoxidans ITSI70. Overall, the wetlands removed 91–93% of the phenanthrene whilst the augmentation of the bacterial strains had a synergistic effect. In comparison, the CWs showed a better treatment efficiency, with a 93% reduction in phenanthrene, a 91.7% reduction in the chemical oxygen demand, an 89% reduction in the biochemical oxygen demand, and a 100% reduction in toxicity. The inoculated bacteria were found growing in the shoots, roots, and water of both wetlands, but were comparatively better adapted to the CWs when compared with the FTWs. Similarly, the plants vegetated in the CWs exhibited better growth than that observed in the FTWs. This study revealed that the FTWs and CWs vegetated with P. australis both had promising potential for the cost-effective bioremediation of phenanthrene-contaminated water.

Keywords

• wetlands
• bacterial consortium
• bioremediation
• resource recovery
• sustainability