Physiological Reports (Aug 2021)

Losing the dogmatic view of cerebral autoregulation

  • Patrice Brassard,
  • Lawrence Labrecque,
  • Jonathan D. Smirl,
  • Michael M. Tymko,
  • Hannah G. Caldwell,
  • Ryan L. Hoiland,
  • Samuel J. E. Lucas,
  • André Y. Denault,
  • Etienne J. Couture,
  • Philip N. Ainslie

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14982
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 15
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In 1959, Niels Lassen illustrated the cerebral autoregulation curve in the classic review article entitled Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in Man. This concept suggested a relatively broad mean arterial pressure range (~60–150 mmHg) wherein cerebral blood flow remains constant. However, the assumption that this wide cerebral autoregulation plateau could be applied on a within‐individual basis is incorrect and greatly variable between individuals. Indeed, each data point on the autoregulatory curve originated from independent samples of participants and patients and represented interindividual relationships between cerebral blood flow and mean arterial pressure. Nonetheless, this influential concept remains commonly cited and illustrated in various high‐impact publications and medical textbooks, and is frequently taught in medical and science education without appropriate nuances and caveats. Herein, we provide the rationale and additional experimental data supporting the notion we need to lose this dogmatic view of cerebral autoregulation.

Keywords