Cardiovascular Diabetology (Aug 2018)

Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a single-center study

  • Xiao-Fang Tang,
  • Yuan-Liang Ma,
  • Ying Song,
  • Jing-Jing Xu,
  • Yi Yao,
  • Chen He,
  • Huan-Huan Wang,
  • Ping Jiang,
  • Lin Jiang,
  • Ru Liu,
  • Zhan Gao,
  • Xue-yan Zhao,
  • Shu-Bin Qiao,
  • Yue-Jin Yang,
  • Run-Lin Gao,
  • Bo Xu,
  • Jin-Qing Yuan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-018-0758-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To improve outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of G2-DESs and BP-DESs in patients with and without DM in a single center in China. Methods A total of 7666 consecutive patients who exclusively had G2-DES or BP-DES implantation throughout 2013 in our center were studied. The primary efficacy endpoint was any target lesion revascularization (TLR), whereas the primary safety endpoint was a composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 2-year follow-up. Results G2-DESs had a similar occurrence of death, non-fatal MI, TLR, stroke, and stent thrombosis compared with BP-DESs in patients with DM (all P > 0.05). The incidence of TVR and TLR was lower for G2-DESs than for BP-DESs in patients without DM (3.2% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.002; 2.2% vs. 4.5%, P 0.05). Conclusions G2-DESs have better efficacy, represented by a reduced risk of TLR, and similar safety compared with BP-DESs in patients without DM. G2-DESs have similar efficacy and safety compared with BP-DESs in patients with DM at 2-year follow-up.

Keywords