PhytoFrontiers (Nov 2023)

Diversity Profiling and the Distribution of Pathotypes and Mating Types in Indian Isolates of Ascochyta rabiei Causing Ascochyta Blight of Chickpea

  • Lakshmaiah Manjunatha,
  • Leela Saisree Uppala,
  • Hunsur S. Mahesha,
  • Aravinda Kumar Konda,
  • Upasana Rani,
  • Shailendra Singh,
  • Narendra Pratap Singh,
  • Yogesh Kumar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTOFR-08-21-0048-R
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 3
pp. 569 – 581

Abstract

Read online

The prevalence and distribution of pathotypes and mating types of Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr. were evaluated during the winter (October to March) seasons of 2017-18 and 2018-19. Forty-five A. rabiei isolates were obtained from six different states. From the survey results, the state of Punjab recorded the highest disease rating (Rating 9) compared with other chickpea-growing areas. The β-tubulin gene was amplified (330 bp) from all the isolates, and sequence analysis was performed. The phylogenetic tree produced by cluster analysis of β-tubulin gene sequences differentiated the 44 A. rabiei isolates. Using multiplex PCR, mating types were identified. From the mating type (MAT) study of all the A. rabiei isolates, amplification was observed at the 490-bp size, which corresponds to mating type 2 (MAT1-2). The four pathotypes (I, II, III, IV) and six physiological races were delineated based on the differential reaction of the disease. The most widely distributed pathotype was pathotype III (52.27%) among the surveyed regions of North Indian states, except Uttarakhand (where only pathotype II was recorded), followed by the least aggressive pathotype I (22.7%), highly aggressive pathotype IV (15.9%), and aggressive pathotype II (9.1%). Among the six physiological races identified, the most common races were race 5 (25%), followed by race 1 (22.73%), race 6 (18.18%), race 4 (18.18%), race 3 (9.09%), and race 2 (6.82%). Because of the prevalence of a single mating type among the surveyed locations in India, we opine that there may be less diversity in A. rabiei compared with isolates reported from other countries. However, to substantiate this conclusion, evaluation of more isolates of A. rabiei is required. [Figure: see text] Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.

Keywords