Influence of simulated hypogravity on oxygen uptake during treadmill running

Abstract

Abstract Prolonged exposure to microgravity during spaceflights leads to severe deterioration in the physical performance of astronauts. To understand the effectiveness of existing in‐flight daily countermeasures and to plan exercise onboard the International Space Station, we compared supine treadmill running to traditional upright treadmill running on earth. Specifically, we assessed the cardiorespiratory responses to conventional upright running to the responses to supine treadmill running under 0.3 g, 0.6 g, and 1 g of body weight in younger (20–30 years, n = 14, 8 females) and older healthy adults (50–60 years, n = 12, 6 females). Maximal cardiorespiratory capacity was additionally evaluated by performing an incremental running protocol on each treadmill. Maximum speed was greater for 0.3 g and 0.6 g in supine than for upright running (18.5 km/h (1.1) and 15.9 (3.1) vs 13.2 (2.4) p < 0.001). In contrast, maximum oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) and maximum heart rate (HRmax) were greater in upright running than in all supine conditions (Upright treadmill running vs S1.0G vs S0.6G vs S0.3G, 41.7 ml kg−1 min−1 (7.2) vs 30.5 (6.6) vs 32.9 (7.0) vs 30.9 (5.2), p < 0.001 and 171 beats min−1 (14) vs 152 (24) vs 155 (20) vs 152 (18), p < 0.001, respectively). The reduction in V˙O2max was remarkably similar across all three supine conditions, could not be increased by higher running speeds and can be well explained by reduced ground reaction forces (GRF). Thus, although a gravity‐related restriction of pulmonary gas exchange or perfusion of the legs when exercising in the supine position can be suspected, findings are also explicable on grounds of the vertical treadmill mechanics. Reduced loading will constitute a substantial limitation to V˙O2 in space with implications for crew health and the physical deterioration of astronauts.

Keywords

• countermeasures
• microgravity
• oxygen uptake
• spaceflight
• supine running
• V ˙ O 2max