Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques (Mar 2016)

Microleakage of Composite Resin Restorations Using a Type of Fifth and Two Types of Seventh Generations of Adhesive Systems: A Comparative Study

  • Mitra Tabari,
  • Samane Gharekhani,
  • Behnaz Esmaeili,
  • Arash Poorsattar Bejeh Mir,
  • Mobina Mollaei,
  • Mona Alimohammadi,
  • Mahmood Haji Ahmadi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22038/jdmt.2015.6246
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 1
pp. 17 – 22

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: In recent dentin adhesive systems etching of enamel/dentin are achieved simultaneously. The objective was to evaluate the microleakage of composite restorations using Single Bond2 (5th generation), Clearfil S3 Bond and G Bond (7th generation). Methods: Class V cavities were prepared on 45 extracted intact premolars with gingival margins at the cementoenamel junction and they were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15) based on the type of adhesives: Single Bond2 (5th generation), Clearfil S3 Bond and G Bond (7th generation). After applying the adhesives, the cavities were filled with Z250 composite resin. The occlusal and gingival microleakage was evaluated using 2% basic fuchsin staining technique. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni corrected Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The mean rank of occlusal microleakage exhibited significant differences by comparison of G Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond and Single Bond2 (21.07, 30.67) and 17.27, respectively) (P=0.005). There was a significant difference in gingival microleakage of different bonding agents (34.40, 17.83 and 16.77 for G Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond and Single Bond2, respectively) (P

Keywords