Heliyon (Mar 2020)
Survivability of alginate-microencapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum during storage, simulated food processing and gastrointestinal conditions
Abstract
A comparison between the most investigated alginate-based encapsulating agents was performed in the current study. Here, the survivability of Lactobacillus plantarum microencapsulated with alginate (Alg) combined with skim milk (Sm), dextrin (Dex), denatured whey protein (DWP) or coated with chitosan (Ch) was evaluated after exposure to different heat treatments and in presence of some food additives, during storage and under simulated gastrointestinal condition. In addition, the encapsulated cells were evaluated for production of different bioactive compounds such as exopolysacchar.ides and antimicrobial substances compared with the unencapsulated cells. The results showed that only Alg-Sm maintained the viability of the cells >106 cfu/g at the pasteurization temperature (65 °C for 30 min). Interestingly, storage under refrigeration conditions increased the viability of L. plantarum entrapped within all the tested encapsulating agents for 4 weeks. However, under freezing condition, only Alg-DWP and Alg-Sm enhanced the survival of the entrapped cells for 3 months. All the microencapsulated cells were capable of growing at the different NaCl concentrations (1%–5%) except for cells encapsulated with Alg-Dex, showed viability loss at 3% and 5% NaCl concentrations. Tolerance of the microencapsulated cells toward organic acids was varied depending on the type of organic acid. Alg-Ch and Alg-Sm provide better survival for the cells under simulated gastric juice; however, all offer a good survival for the cells under simulated intestinal condition. Our findings indicated that Alg-Sm proved to be the most promising encapsulating combination that maintains the survivability of L. plantarum to the recommended dose level under almost all the stress conditions adopted in the current study. Interestingly, the results also revealed that microencapsulation does not affect the metabolic activity of the entrapped cells and there was no significant difference in production of bioactive compounds between the encapsulated and the unencapsulated cells.
