Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (Dec 2018)

Changes in bioimpedance analysis components before and after hemodialysis

  • Hyunsuk Kim,
  • Gwang Ho Choi,
  • Kwang Eon Shim,
  • Jung Hoon Lee,
  • Nam Ju Heo,
  • Kwon-Wook Joo,
  • Jong-Woo Yoon,
  • Yun Kyu Oh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.18.0035
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 37, no. 4
pp. 393 – 403

Abstract

Read online

Background : This study compared nutritional parameters in hemodialysis (HD) subjects and controls using bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and investigated how BIA components changed before and after HD. Methods : This cross-sectional study included 147 subjects on maintenance HD from two hospitals and 298 propensity score-matched controls from one healthcare center. BIA was performed pre- and post-HD at mid-week dialysis sessions. Results : Extracellular water/total body water (ECW/TBW) and waist-hip ratio were higher in the HD patients’ the other variables were higher in the control group. The cardiothoracic ratio correlated best with overhydration (r = 0.425, P < 0.01) in HD subjects. Blood pressure, hemoglobin, creatinine, and uric acid positively correlated with the lean tissue index in controls; however, most of these nutritional markers did not show significant correlations in HD subjects. Normal hydrated weight was predicted to be higher in the pre-HD than post-HD measurements. Predicted ultrafiltration (UF) volume difference based on pre- and post-HD ECW/TBW and measured UF volume difference showed a close correlation (r2 = 0.924, P < 0.01). Remarkably, the leg phase angle increased in the post-HD period. Conclusion : The estimated normal hydrated weight using ECW/TBW can be a good marker for determining dry weight. HD subjects had higher ECW/TBW but most nutritional indices were inferior to those of controls. It was possible to predict UF volume differences using BIA, but the post-HD increase in leg phase angle, a nutritional marker, must be interpreted with caution.

Keywords