Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (Jul 2020)

Integrated stepped alcohol treatment for patients with HIV and at-risk alcohol use: a randomized trial

  • E. Jennifer Edelman,
  • Stephen A. Maisto,
  • Nathan B. Hansen,
  • Christopher J. Cutter,
  • James Dziura,
  • Yanhong Deng,
  • Lynn E. Fiellin,
  • Patrick G. O’Connor,
  • Roger Bedimo,
  • Cynthia L. Gibert,
  • Vincent C. Marconi,
  • David Rimland,
  • Maria C. Rodriguez-Barradas,
  • Michael S. Simberkoff,
  • Janet P. Tate,
  • Amy C. Justice,
  • Kendall J. Bryant,
  • David A. Fiellin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-020-00200-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background At-risk levels of alcohol use threaten the health of patients with HIV (PWH), yet evidence-based strategies to decrease alcohol use and improve HIV-related outcomes in this population are lacking. We examined the effectiveness of integrated stepped alcohol treatment (ISAT) on alcohol use and HIV outcomes among PWH and at-risk alcohol use. Methods In this multi-site, randomized trial conducted between January 28, 2013 through July 14, 2017, we enrolled PWH and at-risk alcohol use [defined as alcohol consumption of ≥ 14 drinks per week or ≥ 4 drinks per occasion in men ≤ 65 years old or ≥ 7 drinks per week or ≥ 3 drinks per occasion in women or men > 65 years old]. ISAT (n = 46) involved: Step 1- Brief Negotiated Interview with telephone booster, Step 2- Motivational Enhancement Therapy, and Step 3- Addiction Physician Management. Treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 47) involved receipt of a health handout plus routine care. Analyses were conducted based on intention to treat principles. Results Despite a multi-pronged approach, we only recruited 37% of the target population (n = 93/254). Among ISAT participants, 50% advanced to Step 2, among whom 57% advanced to Step 3. Participants randomized to ISAT and TAU had no observed difference in drinks per week over the past 30 days at week 24 (primary outcome) [least square means (Ls mean) (95% CI) = 8.8 vs. 10.6; adjusted mean difference (AMD) (95% CI) = − 0.4 (− 3.9, 3.0)]. Conclusion An insufficient number of patients were interested in participating in the trial. Efforts to enhance motivation of PWH with at-risk alcohol use to engage in alcohol-related research and build upon ISAT are needed. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01410123, First posted August 4, 2011

Keywords