Journal of Diabetes Research (Jan 2015)

Automated Quantification of Neuropad Improves Its Diagnostic Ability in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy

  • Georgios Ponirakis,
  • Hassan Fadavi,
  • Ioannis N. Petropoulos,
  • Shazli Azmi,
  • Maryam Ferdousi,
  • Mohammad A. Dabbah,
  • Ahmad Kheyami,
  • Uazman Alam,
  • Omar Asghar,
  • Andrew Marshall,
  • Mitra Tavakoli,
  • Ahmed Al-Ahmar,
  • Saad Javed,
  • Maria Jeziorska,
  • Rayaz A. Malik

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/847854
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2015

Abstract

Read online

Neuropad is currently a categorical visual screening test that identifies diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. The diagnostic performance of Neuropad was compared between the categorical and continuous (image-analysis (Sudometrics)) outputs to diagnose diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). 110 subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes underwent assessment with Neuropad, Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (PMNCV), sural nerve action potential (SNAP), Deep Breathing-Heart Rate Variability (DB-HRV), intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD), and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). 46/110 patients had DPN according to the Toronto consensus. The continuous output displayed high sensitivity and specificity for DB-HRV (91%, 83%), CNFD (88%, 78%), and SNAP (88%, 83%), whereas the categorical output showed high sensitivity but low specificity. The optimal cut-off points were 90% for the detection of autonomic dysfunction (DB-HRV) and 80% for small fibre neuropathy (CNFD). The diagnostic efficacy of the continuous Neuropad output for abnormal DB-HRV (AUC: 91%, P=0.0003) and CNFD (AUC: 82%, P=0.01) was better than for PMNCV (AUC: 60%). The categorical output showed no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy for these same measures. An image analysis algorithm generating a continuous output (Sudometrics) improved the diagnostic ability of Neuropad, particularly in detecting autonomic and small fibre neuropathy.