Meta‐analysis of the embryo freezing transfer interval

Abstract

Abstract Background The decision of whether frozen embryo transfer (FET) should be performed in the cycle immediately after OPU or at least one cycle later is controversial. FET could improve pregnancy rates in IVF; however, how much time is needed for the endometrium to return to optimal receptivity after ovarian stimulation is not known. Methods Electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies providing data on the influence of the interval between embryo freezing (or OPU) and FET in FET cycles published between January 1, 2007, and February 1, 2020. Main findings Data analyzed indicated that in the immediate FET cycles, there was a trend to an increased biochemical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.08; CI = 1.00‐1.18), whereas the clinical pregnancy rate was somewhat higher, but without reaching statistical significance (RR = 1.07; CI = 0.99‐1.15). The live birth rate was similar in the two groups (RR = 1.05; CI = 0.95‐1.15), as was the implantation rate (RR = 0.98; CI = 0.83‐1.16). Stratifying by embryo stage or FET type (freeze‐all or FET after failed fresh transfer) showed no differences. Conclusion Systematically delaying FET does not offer benefits to IVF outcomes. In addition, immediate transfer is associated with a nonsignificant trend to better clinical pregnancy rate and it also avoids the psychological effects of prolonging the stress on prospective parents.

Keywords

• delayed transfer
• frozen embryo transfer
• immediate transfer
• IVF
• pregnancy rates