PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases (Jul 2014)

Risk factors for adverse prognosis and death in American visceral leishmaniasis: a meta-analysis.

  • Vinícius Silva Belo,
  • Claudio José Struchiner,
  • David Soeiro Barbosa,
  • Bruno Warlley Leandro Nascimento,
  • Marco Aurélio Pereira Horta,
  • Eduardo Sérgio da Silva,
  • Guilherme Loureiro Werneck

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002982
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 7
p. e2982

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundIn the current context of high fatality rates associated with American visceral leishmaniasis (VL), the appropriate use of prognostic factors to identify patients at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes represents a potential tool for clinical practice. This systematic review brings together information reported in studies conducted in Latin America, on the potential predictors of adverse prognosis (continued evolution of the initial clinical conditions of the patient despite the implementation of treatment, independent of the occurrence of death) and death from VL. The limitations of the existing knowledge, the advances achieved and the approaches to be used in future research are presented.Methods/principal findingsThe full texts of 14 studies conforming to the inclusion criteria were analyzed and their methodological quality examined by means of a tool developed in the light of current research tools. Information regarding prognostic variables was synthesized using meta-analysis. Variables were grouped according to the strength of evidence considering summary measures, patterns and heterogeneity of effect-sizes, and the results of multivariate analyses. The strongest predictors identified in this review were jaundice, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage, HIV coinfection, diarrhea, age 40-50 years, severe neutropenia, dyspnoea and bacterial infections. Edema and low hemoglobin concentration were also associated with unfavorable outcomes. The main limitation identified was the absence of validation procedures for the few prognostic models developed so far.Conclusions/significanceIntegration of the results from different investigations conducted over the last 10 years enabled the identification of consistent prognostic variables that could be useful in recognizing and handling VL patients at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes. The development of externally validated prognostic models must be prioritized in future investigations.